Review on information quality in asset management: reliable decisions from maintenance records
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54901/educa.v9-669Palavras-chave:
information quality, asset management, maintenance records, knowledge management, oil and gasResumo
Organizations with asset-intensive operations in the oil and gas sector depend on their maintenance data for their operational decisions. However, in many organizations, maintenance data is stored as fragmented free text, using an inconsistent taxonomy and incomplete history. The quality of this information affects the quality of the decisions made by the organization and thus affects operational safety, asset availability, and operational costs. In this article, we discuss how information quality influences asset management and how the information affects the organization’s choices and the resulting unplanned downtime, retraining of personnel, and safety risks. To improve the informational foundation for asset management, we present a number of evaluation criteria for maintenance information and, by extension, for organizational decision-making.
Referências
1. ABRAHAM; R.; SCHNEIDER; J.; VOM BROCKE; J. Data governance: a conceptual framework; structured review; and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management; v. 49; p. 424-438; 2019.
2. AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DO PETRÓLEO; GÁS NATURAL E BIOCOMBUSTÍVEIS. Anuário estatístico brasileiro do petróleo; gás natural e biocombustíveis 2026. Rio de Janeiro: ANP; 2026b.
3. AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DO PETRÓLEO; GÁS NATURAL E BIOCOMBUSTÍVEIS. Boletim mensal da produção de petróleo e gás natural: dezembro de 2025. Rio de Janeiro: ANP; 2026ª.
4. ALAVI; M.; LEIDNER; D. E. Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly; v. 25; n. 1; p. 107-136; 2001.
5. ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. ABNT NBR ISO 55000: gestão de ativos — visão geral; princípios e terminologia. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT; 2014.
6. BARDIN; L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70; 2016.
7. BONSIEPE; G. Design; cultura e sociedade. São Paulo: Blucher; 2011.
8. BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709; de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Diário Oficial da União: seção 1; Brasília; DF; 15 ago. 2018.
9. BRUNDAGE; M. P.; SEXTON; T.; HODKIEWICZ; M.; DIMA; A.; LUKENS; S. Technical language processing: unlocking maintenance knowledge. Manufacturing Letters; v. 27; p. 42-46; 2021.
10. BUCHANAN; R. Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues; v. 8; n. 2; p. 5-21; 1992.
11. CAMPBELL; J. D.; REYES-PICKNELL; J. V. Uptime: strategies for excellence in maintenance management. 3. ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.
12. CHOO; C. W. A organização do conhecimento: como as organizações usam a informação para criar significado; construir conhecimento e tomar decisões. São Paulo: Senac São Paulo; 2003.
13. CROSS; N. Design thinking: understanding how designers think and work. Oxford: Berg; 2011.
14. CULLEN; W. D. The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster. London: HMSO; 1990.
15. DAMA INTERNATIONAL. DAMA-DMBOK: data management body of knowledge. 2. ed. Basking Ridge: Technics Publications; 2017.
16. DAVENPORT; T. H.; PRUSAK; L. Conhecimento empresarial: como as organizações gerenciam o seu capital intelectual. Rio de Janeiro: Campus; 1998.
17. DIAS; Murillo; DA SILVA JUNIOR; Dercio Santiago. The Dsres Scale: A Measure of Quality; Reliability; and Nomological Validity in Design Science Research. Veredas do Direito; v. 23; n. 8; p. e236377-e236377; 2026.
18. DRESCH; A.; LACERDA; D. P.; ANTUNES JÚNIOR; J. A. V. Design science research: método de pesquisa para avanço da ciência e tecnologia. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2015.
19. EMPRESA DE PESQUISA ENERGÉTICA. Plano decenal de expansão de energia 2034. Rio de Janeiro: EPE; 2025.
20. GE OIL & GAS. The impact of digital on unplanned downtime: an offshore oil and gas perspective. [S. l.]: General Electric; 2016.
21. GREGOR; S.; HEVNER; A. R. Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly; v. 37; n. 2; p. 337-355; 2013.
22. HEVNER; A. R. A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems; v. 19; n. 2; p. 87-92; 2007.
23. HEVNER; A. R.; MARCH; S. T.; PARK; J.; RAM; S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly; v. 28; n. 1; p. 75-105; 2004.
24. HODKIEWICZ; M.; HO; M. T.-W. Cleaning historical maintenance work order data for reliability analysis. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering; v. 22; n. 2; p. 146-163; 2016.
25. HOPKINS; A. Disastrous decisions: the human and organisational causes of the Gulf of Mexico blowout. Sydney: CCH Australia; 2012.
26. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. Global energy review 2026. Paris: IEA; 2026a.
27. INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY. Oil market report: June 2026. Paris: IEA; 2026b.
28. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 14224: petroleum; petrochemical and natural gas industries — collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment. 3. ed. Geneva: ISO; 2016.
29. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 55001: asset management — asset management system — requirements. 2. ed. Geneva: ISO; 2024.
30. KARDEC; A.; NASCIF; J. Manutenção: função estratégica. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark; 2013.
31. KHATRI; V.; BROWN; C. V. Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM; v. 53; n. 1; p. 148-152; 2010.
32. LAWSON; B. How designers think: the design process demystified. 4. ed. Oxford: Architectural Press; 2005.
33. LU; H.; GUO; L.; AZIMI; M.; HUANG; K. Oil and Gas 4.0 era: a systematic review and outlook. Computers in Industry; v. 111; p. 68-90; 2019.
34. MARCH; S. T.; SMITH; G. F. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems; v. 15; n. 4; p. 251-266; 1995.
35. MORDOR INTELLIGENCE. FPSO market: industry report 2026-2031. Hyderabad: Mordor Intelligence; 2026.
36. MOUBRAY; J. Reliability-centred maintenance. 2. ed. New York: Industrial Press; 1997.
37. MURPHY; G. D. Improving the quality of manually acquired data: applying the theory of planned behaviour to data quality. Reliability Engineering & System Safety; v. 94; n. 12; p. 1881-1886; 2009.
38. NONAKA; I.; TAKEUCHI; H. Criação de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a dinâmica da inovação. Rio de Janeiro: Campus; 1997.
39. PEFFERS; K.; TUUNANEN; T.; ROTHENBERGER; M. A.; CHATTERJEE; S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems; v. 24; n. 3; p. 45-77; 2007.
40. PIPINO; L. L.; LEE; Y. W.; WANG; R. Y. Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM; v. 45; n. 4; p. 211-218; 2002.
41. REASON; J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1997.
42. REDMAN; T. C. The impact of poor data quality on the typical enterprise. Communications of the ACM; v. 41; n. 2; p. 79-82; 1998.
43. RHINEHART; L. O homem dos dados. Rio de Janeiro: Imago; 1994
44. SAUNDERS; M.; LEWIS; P.; THORNHILL; A. Research methods for business students. 5. ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2009.
45. SENGE; P. M. A quinta disciplina: arte e prática da organização que aprende. 29. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Best Seller; 2013.
46. SIMON; H. A. The sciences of the artificial. 3. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996.
47. STRAUSS; A.; CORBIN; J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2. ed. Thousand Oaks; CA: Sage; 1998.
48. TUFTE; E. R. The visual display of quantitative information. 2. ed. Cheshire: Graphics Press; 2001.
49. UNSWORTH; K.; ADRIASOLA; E.; JOHNSTON-BILLINGS; A.; DMITRIEVA; A.; HODKIEWICZ; M. Goal hierarchy: improving asset data quality by improving motivation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety; v. 96; n. 11; p. 1474-1481; 2011.
50. VAN AKEN; J. E.; BERENDS; H.; VAN DER BIJ; H. Problem solving in organizations: a methodological handbook for business students. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
51. VENABLE; J.; PRIES-HEJE; J.; BASKERVILLE; R. FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems; v. 25; n. 1; p. 77-89; 2016.
52. WANASINGHE; T. R. et al. Digital twin for the oil and gas industry: overview; research trends; opportunities; and challenges. IEEE Access; v. 8; p. 104175-104197; 2020.
53. WANG; R. Y.; STRONG; D. M. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems; v. 12; n. 4; p. 5-33; 1996.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
